Bodmando Consulting Group

CategoriesHealth Monitoring and Evaluation Youth

Mid-Term Evaluation of the BMZ-SSF Project

MID-TERM EVALUATION OF THE BMZ-SSF PROJECT AWO International is the Workers’ Welfare (Arbeiterwohlfahrt) Association focused on Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Action. The organisation partners with local NGOs in East Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Central America. Client Name AWO International Country Uganda Technical Area livelihoods Year 2024 CASE STUDY BMZ-SSF-UG-ME-2024 What was the client’s problem? AWO International aims to improve living conditions sustainably across these regions and promote self-reliance. It assists people and communities in creating their own life plans, accessing essential resources and services, and enhancing the social participation of disadvantaged groups including children and adolescents, women, migrants, indigenous individuals, and the elderly or ill. AWO International emphasises the strengthening of Social Structures and Civil Society Organizations, advocating for their involvement and influence within democratic decision-making processes at micro, meso, and macro levels. AWO has been active in Uganda since 2019, implementing the BMZ-SSF funded project “Integration, Food Safety and Nutrition” alongside four local partners (Agency for Accelerated Regional Development (AFARD), Community Volunteer Initiative for Development (COVOID), Uganda Community Based Association for Women and Children Welfare (UCOBAC) and Rural Initiative for Community Empowerment-West Nile (RICE-West Nile). The current 2023-2025 phase covers livelihood development, sustainable agriculture, entrepreneurship, peaceful co-existence, family planning, and climate change. Funded by Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), the entire project spans nine years, divided into three-year phases Objectives of the mid-term evaluation Awo International contracted Bodmando Consulting Group to lead a mid-term evaluation of the BMZ-SSF Project in Uganda. The evaluation had Five main goals which included the following; Evaluate the project’s performance against the desired results as articulated in the project’s logical frameworks. Evaluate the project’s performance against the current development strategies of Uganda. Evaluate the project’s performance against the donor’s feedback, policy and requirements for the SSF. Assess the extent to which the project interventions are addressing cross-cutting issues i.e. gender equality, social inclusion, disability, etc. Provide AWO International with a sound basis for the new project concept 2026-2028. CASE STUDY BMZ-SSF-UG-ME-2024 What Approach and Methodology did Bodmando Undertake? The evaluation was cross sectional by design and it involved the use of mixed methods relying on both primary and secondary data sources to gather information and targeting the wider population in the refugee and host communities, as well as key partners and other stakeholders. Primary data was generated by conducting Key Informant Interviews (KIIs) with the office of the OPM, UNHCR and the BMZ partners, Focus Group Discussions (FGDs)  and a community survey with refugees and host communities. We also used the case study approach as part of the evaluation design allowing the evaluation team to observe, analyse, and assess the effects of the project on the welfare of refugees and host communities. While secondary data was generated from a desk review of relevant internal and external documents. CASE STUDY BMZ-SSF-UG-ME-2024 What value did bodmando unlock? Bodmando’s value lies in its role in conducting the midterm evaluation of AWO International’s project. This evaluation provided critical insights into the project’s progress, effectiveness, and areas for improvement. By identifying challenges and successes, Bodmando contributed to refining the project’s implementation strategy , ensuring that the initiatives in livelihood development, sustainable agriculture, family planning, and climate change adaptation remain impactful and aligned with the community’s needs.

CategoriesYouth

The youth corner model

The Youth Corner model refers to the existence of separate spaces for young people within health facilities or communities, either as rooms, mobile spaces or standalone units in which adolescent and youth-friendly SRH information and services are provided. These have been seen as a promising approach in improving SRH service access and utilization(Khanal et al., 2021; MOH, 2012). In 2012, the Ministry of Health (MoH) formulated the Uganda Adolescent Health Policy and Service Standards with the aim of guiding the provision of Adolescent SRH services. These services encompass a range of offerings, such as clinical care for sexual and gender-based violence, HIV counseling and testing, prenatal and maternity care for pregnant adolescents, HPV immunization, referral and follow-up, breast examination, and information on cervical cancer. Additionally, these services include the provision of information and counseling on health, particularly related to growth and development, as well as guidance on the rights and responsibilities of adolescents (MOH, 2012). Youth corners are operational at various levels of health facilities, spanning from Health Center (HC) IIs to referral hospital levels. Concurrently, community-based adolescent SRH programs are in place, focusing on adolescents and young people, primarily supported by local external Civil Society Organizations(Asingwire et al., 2019). The Youth Corner model is considered a high-impact practice with the potential to enhance SRH outcomes and address challenges such as low contraceptive uptake and high teenage pregnancy rates among young girls. Despite its perceived benefits, limited research has been conducted to provide strong evidence on the actual impact of youth corners on SRH outcomes, particularly among adolescent girls and young women in the context of Uganda. But many programme implementers are noted to hold the conviction that youth corners can potentially increase the access, utilization and satisfaction with SRH services by adolescents and young people. In this blog article we, explore publications surrounding the effectiveness of youth corners in promoting the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents and young people. We also propose recommendations for the improvement in the delivery of youth corner services. Makwinja et al., (2021) discovered that youth spaces play a crucial role in supporting adolescents by providing access to contraceptive products and information. Adolescents suggested accessing contraceptives from local drug stores, pharmacies and hospitals at a health system level and through youth centers, clubs, and corners at a Community level. The peer-to-peer model was highlighted as effective in mitigating fears and encouraging adolescent involvement in contraceptive use. Another study by Muchabaiwa & Mbonigaba  (2019) evaluated national-level interventions, concluding that the adolescent and youth friendly strategy positively impacted HIV testing and STI treatment but lacked evidence for its effect on condom use. Studies also highlighted the positive impact of peer education on sexual health knowledge among adolescents. The study could not find evidence in support of any impact on condom use nor reduction of STI prevalence. Furthermore, the study did not find superior outcomes in regions with more resources. This suggests that the key for better outcomes from future ASRH strategies lies in redesigning service delivery approaches to target HIV hotspots and rural areas as well as improving the strategy’s coordination and monitoring, as well as aligning and enforcing government policies that promote sexual and reproductive health rights. However, barriers have been noted in regards to access to SRH services by adolescents and young people and these range from a lack of knowledge, financial constraints, long queues, inconvenient locations, and unfriendly healthcare providers. Studies from Kenya and Uganda identified barriers at individual, community, and organizational levels, including myths, stigma, and religious beliefs. Stigma surrounding adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH) was a common challenge, affecting access to services. Existing legislative and policy frameworks were also found to be inadequate in promoting ASRH uptake, with inequities in access. Young people have highlighted the lack of involvement in policy formulation, emphasizing the need for policies to consider the priorities and needs of young people. Gaps between policy and practice were noted, with recommendations for increased recognition and integration of young people in SRH policymaking. Recommendations for the Ministry of Health: Recommendations for local authorities: References About the Author: Bodmando Consulting Group (Registration Number: 80034357969942) is a registered international development and humanitarian consulting enterprise headquartered in Wakiso district, Central Uganda but with a team of 15 field staff spread across East and West Africa, South Asia and the MENA region. We are a women led research institution that designs innovative solutions to tackle poverty, health inequities, gender inequality and social injustice using an intersectional lens and human centered design.

CategoriesYouth

Youth Inclusion

The importance of Youth Inclusion. What is the merit of youth inclusion?  It is noted that young people are largely affected by social and economic challenges and yet are largely sidelined during the planning and execution of programmes that affect them. Global development partners have acknowledged the importance of youth inclusion as a pathway to sustainable development. In order to create a more inclusive society, it is crucial to increase youth involvement in decision making processes. The creation of safe and welcoming spaces for young people is essential in increasing their participation in civil society. There are ethical reasons for youth inclusion and these are based on the rights to decision making surrounding their lives. Young people have a duty to ensure their representation and meaningful involvement in development issues that affect them. The concept of meaningful youth engagement has been strongly highlighted in literature. It enhances trust and credibility for organizations, given that they are often seen as influential contributors to societal development. Additionally, youth inclusion is integral to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Recognizing the vital role of youth in this agenda, organizations can enable them to become agents of change and contribute to progress by involving them as partners. Young people are energetic and willing to change society into a form that preserves their future and opportunities are key in supporting them realize their potential. It is thus premised on good grounds that organizations and communities increasingly support the youth cause as a social imperative. It is essential that institutions and communities adopt a youth centered approach that advocates for youth rights and increased opportunities for meaningful co-existence. This includes creating of youth spaces where young people can interact, promoting youth centered research, involving youth in decision-making processes, fostering a supportive culture, and actively listening to their concerns. Moving forward, it is essential to promote meaningful youth engagement, the creation of equal opportunities for youth participation in development, offering the necessary resources and support, and amplification of youth voices. It is necessary that programmes and projects commit to supporting young people and resourcing advocacy for their rights especially in the developing countries where the divide is even more exposed. About the Author: Bodmando Consulting Group (Registration Number: 80034357969942) is a registered international development and humanitarian consulting enterprise headquartered in Wakiso district, Central Uganda but with a team of 15 field staff spread across East and West Africa, South Asia and the MENA region. We are a women led research institution that designs innovative solutions to tackle poverty, health inequities, gender inequality and social injustice using an intersectional lens and human centered design.