Bodmando Consulting Group

Intersectional Analysis

Technical Areas

Intersectional Analysis

At Bodmando, we employ intersectional analysis to unpack the complex ways in which overlapping identities such as gender, age, disability, ethnicity, and migration status which shape people’s experiences of discrimination and access to opportunities. This approach enables us to move beyond surface-level interventions and ensure our programs and policies address the root causes of exclusion and marginalization. We believe that transformative change is only possible when we understand the interconnectedness of systemic barriers and center the realities of those most affected.

Technical Areas

Global and Regional Contexts on Intersectional Inequality

Globally, intersectionality is increasingly recognized as a critical lens in development, policy, and human rights advocacy. However, systems of oppression—such as patriarchy, racism, ableism, and xenophobia—continue to overlap and create compounded disadvantages, especially in fragile contexts. Although frameworks like the SDGs promote inclusion, implementation often lacks nuance.

In many African countries, intersecting identities such as gender, disability, and refugee status often amplify social and economic exclusion. Traditional norms, conflict, and under-resourced institutions contribute to layered vulnerabilities. Still, there’s growing momentum around using intersectional tools in national development plans and humanitarian programming.

South Africa has made strides in promoting equality through constitutional rights, yet deeply rooted intersectional barriers persist. Black women, youth, and persons with disabilities often face overlapping discrimination in accessing employment, healthcare, and justice. Activism around decoloniality and inclusion is increasingly intersectional in its framing.

Europe’s policy environment is more advanced in recognizing intersectionality, particularly in gender equality and anti-discrimination laws. However, marginalized groups such as migrants, Roma communities, and ethnic minorities still encounter compounding inequities. Intersectional analysis is being applied more rigorously in social policy, especially in Western Europe.

Technical Areas

Challenges

  • Intersectional approaches are often underutilized in mainstream development frameworks due to limited awareness and capacity.
  • Data disaggregation by multiple identities (e.g., gender, disability, age) is frequently lacking, making it difficult to track nuanced outcomes.
  • Development programs often take a siloed approach, failing to recognize overlapping vulnerabilities.
  • Institutional resistance and limited funding hinder the integration of intersectional tools in project design.
  • Crisis contexts such as pandemics or conflict further expose intersectional gaps in response and recovery efforts.

Technical Areas

Opportunities

  • Increased global focus on equity and justice creates space for more intersectional frameworks in programming and policy.
  • The growth of participatory research and storytelling methods strengthens community-led insights into intersecting barriers.
  • Digital tools and AI offer potential to map and analyze complex datasets through an intersectional lens.
  • Academic and policy discourse on intersectionality is expanding, promoting cross-sectoral collaboration.
  • Development partners and donors are now demanding more inclusive and intersectionality-aware approaches in funding criteria.

Technical Areas

Recommendations

  • Mainstream intersectional analysis across all project phases from needs assessment to evaluation.
  • Invest in capacity building to help teams and partners apply intersectional frameworks and tools.
  • Ensure data collection methods disaggregate across key identity markers and are sensitive to context.
  • Engage affected communities meaningfully to validate analysis and shape inclusive solutions.
  • Allocate resources for long-term intersectional programming, not just pilot initiatives.

Technical Areas

What Bodmando Does

  • At Bodmando, we embed intersectional analysis across all phases of our work—from situational assessments to program design, implementation, and evaluation.
  • Guided by globally recognized frameworks such as Crenshaw’s Intersectionality Model, the Social Relations Approach, and the UN Women Intersectionality Toolkit, we support partners in understanding how overlapping identities such as age, gender, disability, ethnicity, and migration status interact to influence exclusion and inequality.
  • We pay particular attention to adolescents, women and girls, persons with disabilities, refugees, and other historically marginalized populations.
  • Our participatory approaches elevate their voices and perspectives in shaping responsive, equitable solutions.Through this lens, we help build systems that reflect lived experiences, dismantle structural barriers, and advance inclusive development outcomes.

Kimberlé Crenshaw

Intersectionality is not about identities. It's about how structures make those identities matter.

Technical Areas

References

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color.
  • UN Women. Intersectionality Toolkit.
  • Visit us at bodmando.org (non-clickable for display: https://bodmando.org)
  •  

Connect With Bodmando